My whirlwind tour of Iraq - well, of LSA Anaconda and the Green Zone - has ended. I am back in Frankfurt. I was originally meant to depart the theater via a National Air Cargo IL-76 to Sharjah, which would have been cool, but the airplane took off fifteen minutes early, stranding me and its other pax. Dismayed, I dropped by the space-a desk just to see what my options were, just as a C-17 to Frankfurt with empty seats was manifesting. Nine hours later I touched down in Germany. This is sort of the military equivalent of winning the lottery, or divine intervention in your favour.
I'd like to officially thank
octal and
midendian for being such gracious hosts.
I have to admit I feel a few moral qualms about having been basically a tourist in a combat zone. There's a hint of ghoulishness to it, journalistic intentions notwithstanding. Oh well. It's not like I consumed anything other than food, space, and time, all of which are anything but scarce in the modern American military.
Not much of interest happened on base after the mudstorm. I discovered the Green Beans Cafe, basically a fully modern Starbucks-esque coffee shop in a trailer, its gleaming chrome and pastel colours dizzyingly out of place. I saw Apache gunships patrol the fence line, and I watched a pair of F-16s take off at night with only their afterburners visible, like disembodied flames, hurtling skywards with unearthly, earsplitting howls.
I tried to keep the last few posts of devoid of opinion as possible. Here's where I'll stop with the recitation of facts and start with a little analysis. Most of it based on second- and thirdhand information, to be sure, but now filtered through at least a little firsthand experience.
I didn't appreciate how widespread the American military presence is in Iraq. There's something like a hundred bases. It sure as hell looks more like an army of occupation than an army of liberation. Of course, it helped that all they had to do was take over all of Saddam's bases; he'd already occupied his own country.
The notion that America invaded Iraq for oil does not hold up - or at least, if they did, they failed badly. There isn't enough oil here to justify the conflict's incredible and ongoing cost. It's good that they got rid of Saddam. America's presence in Iraq is arguably keeping its homeland safe by giving suicide bombers a local target to attack. And in the long run, a democratic Iraq may lead a wave of much-needed change in the Middle East. (Because, let's face it, most of the rest of the Arab world is run by despots who vary only in the degree of their barbarity. Today the IHT reported that Kuwait, that staunch ally, once again shelved the notion of giving women the vote.) But the country is still a bloody mess, and I'm sure it will remain so for at least a few years yet.
The insurgents have succeeded in creating a no-win-for-anyone situation. They're just dangerous enough to have segregated the American military from the rest of the country. From what I can tell, all rebuilding activity has basically stopped because providing security would be too expensive, and Westerners just don't leave the bases any more (I include Baghdad International and the Green Zone as bases) unless on patrol or surrounded by heavy security. And so power, sewage, etc, remain for the most part unrepaired. I imagine American commanders are reluctant to change that and put their troops at risk, now that the insurgency is mostly "just Iraqis killing Iraqis". But the insurgents can't possibly grow into anything more than a thorn in the American side.
The new government is supposed to change things, but it's weak and fractious, and risks being perceived as nothing more than a puppet of the Americans. Which it probably pretty much is. I's hard to imagine them asking America to leave, and even harder to imagine the USA acceding. Why the new government is a strong federal system is beyond me - a very loose federation, one that accepts the Kurd/Sunni/Shiite divisions within the country, seems to make umpteen zillion times more sense. But I guess it's not the American way, and it would anger the Turks, and we can't have that. Sigh.
So you've got a badly designed puppet government, an army of occupation, a widespread insurgency - does this mean things are inevitably going to get worse? Not necessarily. For one thing, Saddam was not exactly a tough act to follow. The US is not unanimously hated across the country. The insurgents are still a small minority. But resentment has to be slowly growing, and the new Iraqi forces better get their act together soon.
Another thing I didn't appreciate before going there is the extent to which the conflict has been privatized. The US government and military contracts out enormous amounts of services - from cleaning Porta-Potties, to maintaining power and water on bases, to armed mercenary security - to third parties such as KBR, who in turn subcontract them to 'TCNs', the result being that the grunt work of the military occupation of Iraq is done by Indians, Turks and Filipinos, working on US bases, paid little (but more than they'd get back home) for two-year contracts with no vacations, living six to a room. The fact that you can mine an endless lode of black comedy from TCNs probably doesn't make up for the unpleasant tang of indentured serfdom.
You'd think America would have learned from the mistakes of 19th century England; instead it seems to be trying to repeat colonialism all over again. With the best of intentions, of course. Go in, win a decisive military victory, enforce free trade, import cheap labour to do the jobs you won't soil your hands with yourself, create an entirely segregated colonial society, prop up a local 'government' with the understanding that it won't ever bite the hand that feeds it, and then look bewildered when it all ends in blood, tears, and bullets. Maybe it will be different this time. Maybe the world has changed. Maybe.
I'd like to officially thank
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I have to admit I feel a few moral qualms about having been basically a tourist in a combat zone. There's a hint of ghoulishness to it, journalistic intentions notwithstanding. Oh well. It's not like I consumed anything other than food, space, and time, all of which are anything but scarce in the modern American military.
Not much of interest happened on base after the mudstorm. I discovered the Green Beans Cafe, basically a fully modern Starbucks-esque coffee shop in a trailer, its gleaming chrome and pastel colours dizzyingly out of place. I saw Apache gunships patrol the fence line, and I watched a pair of F-16s take off at night with only their afterburners visible, like disembodied flames, hurtling skywards with unearthly, earsplitting howls.
I tried to keep the last few posts of devoid of opinion as possible. Here's where I'll stop with the recitation of facts and start with a little analysis. Most of it based on second- and thirdhand information, to be sure, but now filtered through at least a little firsthand experience.
I didn't appreciate how widespread the American military presence is in Iraq. There's something like a hundred bases. It sure as hell looks more like an army of occupation than an army of liberation. Of course, it helped that all they had to do was take over all of Saddam's bases; he'd already occupied his own country.
The notion that America invaded Iraq for oil does not hold up - or at least, if they did, they failed badly. There isn't enough oil here to justify the conflict's incredible and ongoing cost. It's good that they got rid of Saddam. America's presence in Iraq is arguably keeping its homeland safe by giving suicide bombers a local target to attack. And in the long run, a democratic Iraq may lead a wave of much-needed change in the Middle East. (Because, let's face it, most of the rest of the Arab world is run by despots who vary only in the degree of their barbarity. Today the IHT reported that Kuwait, that staunch ally, once again shelved the notion of giving women the vote.) But the country is still a bloody mess, and I'm sure it will remain so for at least a few years yet.
The insurgents have succeeded in creating a no-win-for-anyone situation. They're just dangerous enough to have segregated the American military from the rest of the country. From what I can tell, all rebuilding activity has basically stopped because providing security would be too expensive, and Westerners just don't leave the bases any more (I include Baghdad International and the Green Zone as bases) unless on patrol or surrounded by heavy security. And so power, sewage, etc, remain for the most part unrepaired. I imagine American commanders are reluctant to change that and put their troops at risk, now that the insurgency is mostly "just Iraqis killing Iraqis". But the insurgents can't possibly grow into anything more than a thorn in the American side.
The new government is supposed to change things, but it's weak and fractious, and risks being perceived as nothing more than a puppet of the Americans. Which it probably pretty much is. I's hard to imagine them asking America to leave, and even harder to imagine the USA acceding. Why the new government is a strong federal system is beyond me - a very loose federation, one that accepts the Kurd/Sunni/Shiite divisions within the country, seems to make umpteen zillion times more sense. But I guess it's not the American way, and it would anger the Turks, and we can't have that. Sigh.
So you've got a badly designed puppet government, an army of occupation, a widespread insurgency - does this mean things are inevitably going to get worse? Not necessarily. For one thing, Saddam was not exactly a tough act to follow. The US is not unanimously hated across the country. The insurgents are still a small minority. But resentment has to be slowly growing, and the new Iraqi forces better get their act together soon.
Another thing I didn't appreciate before going there is the extent to which the conflict has been privatized. The US government and military contracts out enormous amounts of services - from cleaning Porta-Potties, to maintaining power and water on bases, to armed mercenary security - to third parties such as KBR, who in turn subcontract them to 'TCNs', the result being that the grunt work of the military occupation of Iraq is done by Indians, Turks and Filipinos, working on US bases, paid little (but more than they'd get back home) for two-year contracts with no vacations, living six to a room. The fact that you can mine an endless lode of black comedy from TCNs probably doesn't make up for the unpleasant tang of indentured serfdom.
You'd think America would have learned from the mistakes of 19th century England; instead it seems to be trying to repeat colonialism all over again. With the best of intentions, of course. Go in, win a decisive military victory, enforce free trade, import cheap labour to do the jobs you won't soil your hands with yourself, create an entirely segregated colonial society, prop up a local 'government' with the understanding that it won't ever bite the hand that feeds it, and then look bewildered when it all ends in blood, tears, and bullets. Maybe it will be different this time. Maybe the world has changed. Maybe.